Prohibits the enforcement of any federal regulation by a state department or agency until the enforcement is approved by the General Assembly
Impact
The implications of SB771 are profound, particularly in re-evaluating the relationship between state and federal authority. The bill aims to prevent what supporters consider unwanted federal overreach into state matters. If enacted, it would affect all existing and future state regulations that pertain to federal guidelines, thereby placing significant power in the hands of the state legislature to dictate the applicability of these federal rules. This could stall the implementation of essential regulations in areas such as public health, environmental protection, and labor relations, which often have a federal-state interaction.
Summary
Senate Bill 771 introduces significant changes to the enforcement of federal regulations by state agencies in Missouri. The bill mandates that no federal rule or regulation can be enforced by any state department or agency without prior approval from the General Assembly. This stipulation seeks to reinforce the state's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, emphasizing the independence of state governance. By establishing stringent review criteria for federal regulations, SB771 challenges the traditional collaborative governance model between state and federal governments.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB771 arise from discussions about governance efficiency and local needs. Critics argue that requiring legislative approval for all federal regulations could lead to a bureaucratic bottleneck, delaying the implementation of vital policies necessary for health and safety. Additionally, opponents fear that it erodes local control, diminishing the state's ability to respond quickly and effectively to federal mandates that address urgent public issues. Proponents of the bill, however, emphasize that it is a necessary safeguard against federal encroachment on state rights, viewing the bill as a necessary step to preserving autonomy and legislative power at the state level.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.