Alabama House Bill HB330

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Report Pass: 3/5/25
• Engrossed: 4/10/25
• Refer: 4/15/25

Caption

Alabama Lead Ban Act; percentages of lead that constitute "lead-free" revised; city and county plumbing codes required to conform; certain applications exempted

Impact

If enacted, HB330 would compel all city and county plumbing codes to align with these new definitions of lead-free within a specified timeframe, ensuring consistency across the state. The bill specifies acceptable lead content levels, which would significantly reduce the potential for lead contamination in drinking water systems. The Department of Environmental Management will oversee the compliance of plumbing codes, further reinforcing state regulation over public health matters related to plumbing and water quality.

Summary

House Bill 330, titled the Alabama Lead Ban Act, aims to amend existing legislation regarding the definitions and acceptable levels of lead in plumbing materials. Specifically, the bill revises what constitutes 'lead-free' in terms of solder, flux, and the wetted surfaces of pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings, and fixtures. These amendments are intended to update the state's plumbing codes to align with contemporary health and safety standards concerning lead exposure.

Sentiment

The reception of HB330 appears to be largely positive among lawmakers, as evidenced by its unanimous passage in the House with 100 votes in favor and none opposed. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of protecting public health and the environment from the adverse effects of lead exposure, particularly its implications for vulnerable populations. There is a general consensus that updating the lead definitions and requiring local compliance is a critical step towards safer drinking water.

Contention

Despite its support, the bill does come with certain exemptions, particularly concerning nonpotable water uses, which could spark debate about the efficacy of lead regulations for materials that are not used for drinking water. This aspect might raise questions about the broader implications of the regulations and whether further adjustments are needed to ensure comprehensive safety measures in all water-related applications.