Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB348

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25

Caption

In firearms and other dangerous articles, providing for report of theft or loss of firearm; and imposing a penalty.

Impact

If enacted, SB348 establishes a legal framework that mandates prompt reporting of firearm thefts, which could lead to a more seamless exchange of information among police departments and the Pennsylvania State Police. This could potentially result in increased recovery rates of stolen firearms and diminish the chances of these weapons being used in crimes. Furthermore, the bill imposes a penalty for non-compliance, classifying it as a summary offense with a fine of up to $500, which may serve as a deterrent for negligent firearm ownership.

Summary

Senate Bill 348 aims to amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes regarding firearms and other dangerous articles. This legislation introduces a requirement for firearm owners to report any theft or loss of their firearms to local law enforcement within 24 hours of discovery. The bill outlines the necessary information to be provided during this report, including the owner's details and firearm specifics like serial number and model. The intent is to improve coordination among law enforcement agencies and enhance public safety by tracking stolen firearms more effectively.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SB348 appears to be mixed. Proponents of the bill likely argue that it is a necessary measure to enhance public safety and accountability among firearm owners. They may contend that timely reporting of firearm loss or theft can help prevent illegal usage by ensuring quicker responses from law enforcement. Conversely, critics may express concerns regarding the implications for responsible gun owners, who could fear excessive penalties or feel that such legislation does not substantially address underlying issues related to gun violence.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding SB348 involves the perceived effectiveness of mandatory reporting in preventing gun violence or theft crimes. Opponents may question whether this bill truly addresses the root causes of firearm-related crime or merely imposes additional burdens on law-abiding citizens. The debate may also extend to discussions about the balance between personal responsibility and state-imposed regulations, underscoring significant opinions from both sides about the right approach to firearm ownership and public safety.