If enacted, SB 355 would grant rights holders and operators of venues the authority to take legal action against individuals or entities that violate these regulations. This could potentially reduce the number of automated purchases that lead to ticket scalping, thus making tickets more accessible to the general public at fair prices. The bill proposes a penalty structure that includes compensatory damages and additional financial penalties for each ticket sold in violation of the law. By taking a stance against these practices, the bill aims to create a more equitable ticketing landscape for consumers.
Summary
Senate Bill 355 seeks to amend the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law in Pennsylvania by establishing new regulations concerning online ticket sales. The bill specifically prohibits the use of automated software to access ticket sale platforms for purposes of purchasing tickets with the intent to resell them. This measure is aimed at curbing the prevalence of ticket scalping, which has been a growing issue as more consumers turn to online avenues for purchasing tickets to events. By imposing restrictions on how tickets can be acquired and resold, the bill aims to protect consumers from unfair business practices that put them at a disadvantage in the ticket buying process.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around the bill appears to be supportive among consumer advocacy groups and rights holders, who argue that it is necessary to address the challenges posed by ticket scalpers. Advocates believe that the bill will help ensure that fans have a fair opportunity to purchase tickets at reasonable prices. However, there are concerns from some industry stakeholders who fear that such regulations could inadvertently hinder ticket sales and complicate the buying process for legitimate consumers. The discussion surrounding this bill highlights the tension between consumer protection efforts and the operational realities of the online ticketing industry.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the definitions of 'rights holders' and 'operators' within the bill, as these definitions will determine who can enforce the new regulations and the extent to which they can seek damages. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the implications for legitimate software developers who create tools for research and enforcement of ticketing rules. As the bill moves forward, it is likely to spark further debate on the balance between protecting consumer interests and fostering an innovative ticketing environment.
Providing for school safety practices and for student online personal data safety practices; imposing penalties; making an appropriation; and making editorial changes.
Providing for protection of certain personal data of consumers; imposing duties on controllers and processors of personal data of consumers; providing for enforcement; prescribing penalties; and establishing the Consumer Privacy Fund.
Providing for duties of covered entities to protect the best interests of children that use online services, products or features and for data protection impact assessments; prohibiting certain actions by covered entities; and imposing penalties.
Providing for skill video gaming; imposing duties on the Department of Revenue; providing for issuance of licenses for skill video gaming; imposing a tax and criminal and civil penalties; and providing for zoning.
Providing for skill video gaming; imposing duties on the Department of Revenue; providing for issuance of licenses for skill video gaming; imposing a tax and criminal and civil penalties; and providing for zoning.