Insurance; certain consumer protections contingent upon repeal of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; provide
Impact
If enacted, the bill would significantly influence health insurance policies in Georgia, mandating that all health benefit plans adhere to protections typical of the ACA. The legislation aims to safeguard consumers from potential pitfalls that could arise from the repeal of the ACA, ensuring access to necessary medical services while also providing a pathway for dependents to maintain coverage. By guaranteeing these levels of protection, the bill could greatly enhance the security of health insurance for many Georgia residents, particularly those with ongoing health concerns or young adult dependents.
Summary
House Bill 658 aims to amend Georgia's insurance laws by introducing specific consumer protections that would come into effect only if the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is repealed. The bill seeks to ensure that health benefit plans provide essential health services without imposing limits on coverage and prohibit the denial of coverage based on preexisting conditions. It also mandates that preventive services be offered at no additional cost, alongside extending coverage for dependents up to the age of 26.
Contention
The primary contention surrounding HB 658 is its conditional nature, directly tied to the repeal of the ACA, which remains a politically charged issue. Supporters argue that the bill is essential to maintain coverage standards and protect consumers from insurance company practices that could unfairly disadvantage them. However, opponents may view the bill's reliance on the repeal of the ACA as problematic, fearing it could expose citizens to less comprehensive health coverage in the absence of ACA protections. Additionally, critics might express concerns about the implications for state healthcare funding and the overall healthcare landscape should the ACA be repealed.
"Surprise Billing Consumer Protection Act"; ensure consumer access to quality healthcare by setting adequacy standards for network plans offered by an insurer
Insurance; discriminating against certain healthcare facilities and providers in connection with the administration of provider administered drugs; prohibit insurers