Pennsylvania House Bill HB798

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/25
• Refer: 3/3/25

Caption

In powers and duties in general, further providing for departmental reports.

Impact

One significant impact of HB 798 is its focus on emergency preparedness. By requiring departments to evaluate and report on their vulnerabilities, the bill seeks to bolster state readiness for future emergencies. This could lead to improved resource allocation and strategic planning within departments to enhance their responsiveness in crises. However, it also introduces a requirement for departments to maintain and manage thorough reporting processes, which may necessitate adjustments in their current administrative practices.

Summary

House Bill 798 proposes amendments to the Administrative Code of 1929, specifically targeting departmental reporting obligations. The bill mandates that, starting in 2025, the heads of administrative departments, excluding certain offices such as the Attorney General's, submit annual reports to the Governor detailing the condition, management, and financial transactions of their respective departments. The comprehensive reports are intended to assess weaknesses and risks that might impact the ability of departments to respond effectively to emergencies. This shift towards increased accountability aims to ensure that departments are transparent about their operational challenges and preparedness.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 798 appears to be largely supportive, with proponents arguing that enhanced reporting requirements will lead to greater government accountability and transparency. Supporters emphasize the importance of preparedness, particularly in a state that may face various emergencies. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the administrative burden this may place on departments, especially smaller ones, which could struggle to fulfill these new reporting requirements while also managing their core functions.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill could arise from the confidentiality provisions it establishes. The reports mandated by HB 798, as well as all associated documents and materials, are designated as confidential and not subject to public disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law. This raises questions about transparency and public access to information, as opponents may argue that such confidentiality could hinder accountability and prevent meaningful oversight of government operations. Balancing the need for security with the principles of public transparency is likely to be a significant element of discussions as the bill progresses.