Hawaii House Bill HR44

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/25
• Refer: 3/14/25

Caption

Encouraging Future Legislatures To Pass A Proposed Constitutional Amendment, And The Electorate To Ratify The Proposed Amendment, Guaranteeing All Individuals The Right To A Clean And Healthy Environment And A Stable Climate.

Impact

If passed, HR44 would establish an amendment that enshrines environmental rights into the state constitution, similar to amendments already adopted in states like Montana, New York, and Pennsylvania. This would not only safeguard natural resources like clean air and water but also promote an active approach to combating pollution and protecting native ecosystems. By elevating the right to a healthy environment to constitutional status, the bill may become a significant tool in litigation and policy development concerning environmental protections.

Summary

House Resolution 44 (HR44) encourages future legislatures in Hawaii to pass a proposed constitutional amendment guaranteeing individuals the right to a clean and healthy environment, as well as a stable climate. The resolution builds upon significant concerns regarding access to safe water, air quality, and the impacts of climate change on the islands, including rising sea levels and increasing air pollution. Moreover, it recognizes the intrinsic connection between Native Hawaiian culture and environmental health, arguing that traditional practices are integral to maintaining ecological balance.

Contention

However, there may be points of contention surrounding HR44 from various stakeholders. Concerns could arise regarding the implications of this amendment for economic development and how it may influence regulatory frameworks governing businesses and industries, particularly those impacting environmental resources. Additionally, discussions could center on the balance between environmental rights and property rights or regulatory burdens placed on businesses. Opponents might argue that while environmental protections are crucial, the risk of overregulation could stifle economic growth and development in the state.