Relating to venue in certain actions involving a contract for an improvement to real property.
Impact
The enactment of SB1975 is anticipated to bolster consumer protection for Texas residents involved in property improvement contracts. By nullifying out-of-state venue clauses, the bill empowers local contractors and property owners, allowing them greater access to cold procedural justice without the burden of litigating in potentially distant jurisdictions. Additionally, the bill intends to curtail the advantages that non-resident contractors or corporations might leverage over Texas consumers by introducing unworkable contractual terms seemingly designed to benefit their interests over local ones.
Summary
SB1975, proposed in the Texas Senate, addresses venue provisions in contracts pertaining to improvements on real property within the state. The bill specifically states that any clause in a contract that mandates disputes to be brought outside of Texas is deemed void based on public policy. This aims to protect the interests of Texas residents engaged in construction or real estate projects by ensuring any legal actions must occur within the state's jurisdiction, particularly in the county where the defendant resides, where the cause of action occurred, or where the property in question is located.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB1975 has been largely supportive among local contractors and consumer advocacy groups, who perceive the bill as a significant step toward ensuring fair access to the judicial system for residents. However, there may be some reservations expressed by larger contracting companies that operate statewide, as they may see this bill as limiting their operational flexibility and increasing the costs associated with potential disputes. Overall, the bill has prompted a favorable view from many stakeholders focused on consumer rights and local business interests.
Contention
Notable points of contention involve the balance of power between large construction firms and individual property owners. Critics from industry advocacy groups may argue that such legislation could discourage business from engaging with Texas markets due to heightened regulatory pressures and potential increases in litigation. However, proponents counter that these measures are essential for safeguarding local interests against out-of-state entities that might prioritize profit over consumer rights.
Relating to venue and choice of law for certain actions involving censorship by social media platforms and to statutory damages in actions brought by social media users against social media platforms for prohibited censorship.
Relating to exemption of certain civil actions from being subject to a motion to dismiss on the basis of involving the exercise of certain constitutional rights.
Relating to exemption of certain civil actions from being subject to a motion to dismiss on the basis of involving the exercise of certain constitutional rights.