If enacted, HB1954 would modify the interpretation and application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, reinforcing the precedence of civil rights laws over individual claims of religious freedom that might conflict with those rights. This could result in a more robust framework for addressing discrimination in various settings, including healthcare and employment. The bill aims to prevent situations where individuals or entities could claim religious objections to justify harm or the exclusion of others from accessing essential rights and services. Critics argue that this amendment may hinder religious liberties, whereas supporters emphasize the necessity of prioritizing civil rights protections.
Summary
House Bill 1954, known as the 'Do No Harm Act', seeks to amend the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The core objective of this bill is to ensure that the application of religious freedom does not negate the fundamental civil rights of individuals, particularly in areas where federal laws exist to prevent discrimination or harm to third parties. The bill introduces specific exceptions where the protections defined under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act do not apply in scenarios that promote equal opportunity and safeguard against discrimination. This includes provisions from notable laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, among others.
Contention
Notably, discussions around HB1954 have highlighted tensions between the values of religious liberty and the need for equality and protection against discrimination in society. Proponents of the bill argue that it is vital to ensure that religious beliefs do not become a shield for harmful practices or discrimination, while opponents worry that the act could infringe upon religious freedoms by imposing additional restrictions. The outcome of this bill could have significant implications for legal interpretations in future cases regarding the balance of civil rights protections and religious liberties, ultimately shaping the landscape of discrimination law in the country.
Women's Health Protection Act of 2023 This bill prohibits governmental restrictions on the provision of, and access to, abortion services. Before fetal viability, governments may not restrict providers from using particular abortion procedures or drugs, offering abortion services via telemedicine, or immediately providing abortion services if delaying risks the patient's health. Furthermore, governments may not require providers to perform unnecessary medical procedures, provide medically inaccurate information, or comply with credentialing or other conditions that do not apply to providers who offer medically comparable services to abortions. Additionally, governments may not require patients to make medically unnecessary in-person visits before receiving abortion services or disclose their reasons for obtaining services. After fetal viability, governments may not restrict providers from performing abortions when necessary to protect a patient's life and health. The same provisions that apply to abortions before viability also apply to necessary abortions after viability. Additionally, states may authorize post-viability abortions in circumstances beyond those that the bill considers necessary. Further, the bill recognizes an individual's right to interstate travel, including for abortion services. The bill also prohibits governments from implementing measures that are similar to those restricted by the bill or that otherwise single out and impede access to abortion services, unless the measure significantly advances the safety of abortion services or health of patients and cannot be achieved through less restrictive means. The Department of Justice, individuals, or providers may sue states or government officials to enforce this bill, regardless of certain immunity that would otherwise apply.