Judicial official real property records classified as private, and access limited to judicial official real property.
Impact
If enacted, HF2127 would significantly alter how real property records are managed in relation to the personal data of judicial officials. Specifically, it will limit access to these records unless specific conditions are met, such as written consent from the judicial official or a court order. This change is anticipated to not only enhance privacy protections but also shift the responsibilities of county recorders and other government entities in handling such records, likely resulting in new administrative procedures to comply with the changes.
Summary
House File 2127 is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing the privacy of personal information related to judicial officials in Minnesota by classifying their real property records as private data. The underlying intent of the bill is to protect the safety and personal information of judicial officials from being publicly accessible, which could lead to concerns about harassment or identification risks. The bill proposes to amend existing Minnesota statutes governing data privacy and real property records, emphasizing the need to safeguard sensitive personal information collected by government entities.
Contention
Discussion and debates surrounding HF2127 may evoke varying opinions among stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill is vital for the protection of judicial officials and their families, mitigating risks associated with available public information. However, critics could raise concerns about transparency and public access to property records, fearing that excessive privacy measures might hinder the accountability of public officials. As the proposal moves through the legislative process, these viewpoints are expected to fuel discussions about the balance between privacy and accessibility in public records.
Similar To
Judicial official real property records private data classification provision, judicial official real property records access limitations provision, criminal penalties provision
Judiciary provisions policy and technical changes made, including data practices, family law, judiciary policy, guardianships, public defense, and civil law; data classified; and crimes established.
Personal information of justices, judges, and judicial staff designated as private data on individuals; dissemination of personal information restricted; and penalty provided.
Certain personal information of justices, judges, and judicial staff as private data on individuals designation; dissemination of personal information restriction
Personal information of justices, judges, and judicial staff designated as private data on individuals, dissemination of personal information restricted, and penalty provided.
Judicial official real property records private data classification provision, judicial official real property records access limitations provision, criminal penalties provision
Public safety; various provisions modified relating to data held by law enforcement agencies; agency bail or bond notice; sex trafficking minimum sentences; Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission; legislative approval; reason for dismissing charges; dismissals report information; county attorney required action; liability and vicarious liability; crime created for recruiting or educating individuals to trespass or damage critical infrastructure; assaulting a police officer penalty; crime of fleeing in a motor vehicle or failing to obey traffic laws crime established; presence in a stolen vehicle; penalties increased for obstructing trunk highway, airport, or transit traffic; tracking device placement and requirements and expanded uses; criminal penalties; and money appropriated.