Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts Senate Bill S108

Introduced
2/27/25  
Refer
2/27/25  

Caption

Protecting youth during custodial interrogations

Impact

If passed, the legislation would require significant changes to existing interrogation practices. Law enforcement agencies may need to modify their protocols to comply with the new requirement for attorney presence and the recording of all interrogations. This could lead to increased operational costs and training for police personnel to ensure adherence to the new stipulations. Additionally, the changes would likely contribute to a more transparent process for juvenile interrogations, aiming to safeguard their rights and ensure any confessions are made without coercion or misunderstanding.

Summary

Senate Bill S108, titled 'An Act protecting youth during custodial interrogations,' seeks to enhance the legal protections afforded to juveniles during police interrogations. The main thrust of the bill is to ensure that any statement made by a juvenile during such custodial settings is inadmissible unless the juvenile is provided legal representation from the outset. This includes the presence of an attorney before any Miranda warnings are delivered and throughout the entire duration of the interrogation. Furthermore, the bill mandates that all custodial interrogations must be recorded through both audio and video to provide a clear record of the proceedings.

Contention

There are likely to be discussions and debates surrounding the implications of S108, particularly regarding the balance of law enforcement's ability to conduct investigations and the rights of minors. Proponents of the bill argue that it is crucial to protect vulnerable youth from potentially exploitative interrogation techniques that can lead to false confessions. On the other hand, critics may voice concerns that the bill could hinder police investigations, making it more challenging to obtain confessions in cases involving juvenile suspects. The absence of flexibility in waiving attorney presence or recording requirements may also be points of contention.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MA S69

Protecting youth during custodial interrogations

MA H1650

Protecting youth during custodial interrogations

MA S954

Ensuring integrity in juvenile interrogations

MA H1756

Ensuring integrity in juvenile interrogations

MA S148

Protecting reproductive health access, LGBTQ lives, religious liberty, and freedom of movement by banning the sale of cell phone location information

MA S931

Improving juvenile justice data collection

MA S1152

Relative to employment protections for victims of abusive behavior

MA S147

Providing consumers with equal protection for all real estate appraisals

MA S2623

Authorizing the town of Brookline to implement rent stabilization and tenant eviction protections

MA S2612

Order relative to authorizing the joint committee on the Judiciary to make an investigation and study of certain current Senate documents relative to judicial matters.

Similar Bills

CA AB887

Human trafficking victims assistance: grants.

CA AB137

Facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control.

VT H0258

An act relating to law enforcement interrogation policies

TX HB219

Relating to the electronic recording and admissibility of certain custodial interrogations.

TX SB123

Relating to the electronic recording and admissibility of certain custodial interrogations.

VT S0285

An act relating to law enforcement interrogation policies

TX HB3134

Relating to the electronic recording and admissibility of certain custodial interrogations.

TX SB1253

Relating to the electronic recording and admissibility of certain custodial interrogations.