If enacted, HB 2167 would enhance employee rights by specifically outlining wrongful discharge scenarios, including retaliation for refusing to violate public policy. It mandates that employees must have completed a probationary period to claim wrongful discharge, which gives a defined timeframe of six months unless otherwise stated by the employer. The provision that employees could seek damages, including lost wages and benefits for up to four years, underscores the bill's aim to provide substantial recourse for individuals facing unjust termination.
Summary
House Bill 2167 aims to amend Chapter 150A of the General Laws of Massachusetts to provide clearer definitions and provisions regarding wrongful discharge from employment. The bill introduces the concept of 'constructive discharge', defined as the voluntary termination of employment due to intolerable conditions created by the employer. This legislative change is intended to offer greater protection for employees who feel compelled to resign because of harassment or severe workplace issues, emphasizing an employee's right to report such injustices without fear of retaliation.
Contention
Opposition to House Bill 2167 may arise from employer groups concerned about the financial implications and the increased litigation risk associated with claims of wrongful discharge. Proponents argue that it establishes a necessary framework for protecting employees and promoting ethical workplace practices. The explicit exclusions for employees covered by other statutes or contracts suggest potential gaps in protections for certain groups, leading to discussions about balancing interests between employee rights and employer regulatory burdens.
An Act Requiring Discharge Standards Regarding Follow-up Appointments And Prescription Medications For Patients Being Discharged From A Hospital Or Nursing Home Facility.