To promote public safety and better outcomes for youth
Impact
The implications of this bill are significant as it would create a comprehensive change in how various offenses are handled within the juvenile justice system. By raising the age of criminal majority, individuals who commit crimes while aged 18 to 20 would be treated more like juveniles than adults, allowing them access to rehabilitation-focused resources rather than punitive measures. This shift could potentially result in reduced recidivism rates among young offenders by allowing for intervention at a crucial developmental stage.
Summary
House Bill H1923, titled 'An Act to promote public safety and better outcomes for youth', seeks to amend various provisions in Massachusetts General Laws concerning the age of criminal majority. The bill proposes to redefine the age at which an individual is considered a criminal adult, moving it from 18 to 21 years of age. This legislative change aims to foster a more rehabilitative approach to young offenders by aligning legal definitions with developmental science, which suggests that young adults are still in formative years and may not possess the same level of responsibility as older adults.
Contention
Notably, the bill has sparked debate regarding its impact on public safety and the perception of accountability among young adults. Supporters argue that the reform aligns with a growing understanding of adolescent brain development and offers a chance for rehabilitation, while opponents express concerns over the potential for increased crime rates if young individuals are not held fully accountable for their actions. The legislative discussions have highlighted the need for a balanced approach that prioritizes both rehabilitation and public safety.
Extends the voluntary extension of care (VEC) program pursuant to ยง 14-1-6 to children in the juvenile justice system and children who attain reunification prior to their eighteenth (18th) birthday, however, the reunification is not successful.