Minnesota House Bill HF2567

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/20/25
• Refer: 3/20/25

Caption

Stay-or-pay provisions prohibited, made unenforceable, and made against public policy.

Impact

If enacted, HF2567 will significantly affect employers' ability to impose penalties on employees who terminate their employment early. The amendment to the Minnesota Statutes will create clearer legal parameters surrounding employment contracts, emphasizing employee protection against unfair obligations. This change is intended to foster a fairer labor market, where workers can change jobs without the fear of incurring prohibitive financial penalties. The bill also contains provisions for enforcement, allowing employees or prospective employees to initiate civil actions for violations.

Summary

House File 2567 seeks to prohibit the use of 'stay-or-pay' provisions in employment contracts within the state of Minnesota. These provisions typically require an employee to pay a sum of money to the employer if they leave before a designated period, often justified as reimbursement for training or other costs. The bill aims to render such provisions unenforceable, thereby protecting employees from potentially exploitative contractual obligations. The bill clarifies that no employer can present or require an employee to sign a stay-or-pay provision as a condition of employment, which it deems against public policy.

Contention

While the bill has the support of employment rights advocates who argue for fair treatment in the workplace, it may face opposition from some employers who see stay-or-pay provisions as necessary for recovering investments made in employee training. During discussions, proponents have argued that such provisions disproportionately disadvantage lower-wage workers who cannot afford to pay penalties after leaving an employer. As public policy increasingly focuses on employee rights, HF2567 reflects a shift toward stricter regulations on employment agreements.