Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB2384

Introduced
3/26/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  

Caption

Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025

Impact

The establishment of the working group is anticipated to have significant implications for how state and federal authorities monitor and regulate the rapidly evolving financial technology landscape. The group will conduct research and propose legislation to enhance anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures. Notably, this may lead to more stringent regulations on digital assets, potentially impacting how financial technology firms operate and how consumers engage with digital currencies and platforms.

Summary

House Bill 2384, also known as the Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025, aims to establish an Independent Financial Technology Working Group dedicated to combating terrorism and illicit financing. The legislation highlights the increasing concern over the use of digital assets and emerging technologies in financing illegal activities. By creating this working group, the bill seeks to bring together representatives from various government sectors, financial technology companies, and privacy organizations to research and analyze the illicit use of digital assets and develop regulatory responses.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment around HB2384 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters believe that the bill represents a proactive approach to address emerging threats associated with digital finance. However, there are concerns about the balance between security measures and individual privacy rights. Stakeholders from both sides of the discussion have highlighted the importance of ensuring that regulations do not stifle innovation in the financial technology sector while still effectively combating misuse.

Contention

One of the main points of contention is the amount of oversight and regulation that will be applied to financial technologies as a result of the working group's findings. Critics worry that increased regulation might hinder technological advancements and burden startups with compliance costs. Additionally, there is an ongoing debate about the classification of transactions and how privacy can be safeguarded in an era where transparency in finances is prioritized to combat illegal activities.

Companion Bills

US SB2609

Same As Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025

Previously Filed As

US HB2969

Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023

US SB1340

Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023

US HB4763

Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act

US HB6307

CLARITY Act of 2023 Creating Legal Accountability for Rogue Innovators and Technology Act of 2023

US HB8038

21st Century Peace through Strength Act MAHSA Act Mahsa Amini Human rights and Security Accountability Act SHIP Act Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024 Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act FEND Off Fentanyl Act Fentanyl Eradication and Narcotics Deterrence Off Fentanyl Fight CRIME Act Fight and Combat Rampant Iranian Missile Exports Act

US SB3384

Combating Cross-border Financial Crime Act of 2023

US HB6245

Holding Iranian Leaders Accountable Act of 2023

US SB3643

Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Counterfeiting Act of 2024

US HB8771

Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025

US HB5839

Maritime Border Security Technology Improvement Act

Similar Bills

CA SB698

California Council on Science and Technology Policy Fellows: status of services.

CA AB650

Director of Technology: state baseline security controls.

CA AB475

Department of Technology.

KS HB2077

Substitute for HB 2077 by the Committee on Appropriations - Implementing additional reporting requirements for information technology projects and state agencies, requiring additional information technology security training and status reports, requiring reporting of significant cybersecurity audits and changing the membership requirements, terms of members and the quorum requirements for the information technology executive council.

KS HB2019

Implementing additional reporting requirements for information technology projects and state agencies, requiring additional information technology security training and status reports, requiring reporting of significant cybersecurity audits and changing the membership requirements, terms of members and the quorum requirements for the information technology executive council.

HI SB933

Relating To Information Technology Steering Committee.

CO HB1310

Purchasing Transparency Information Technology Procurement

HI SB2287

Relating To The Office Of Enterprise Technology Services.