Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB406

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the exclusion of certain witnesses during a criminal proceeding.

Impact

By allowing courtroom representatives to remain in the courtroom while other witnesses are testifying, SB406 seeks to enhance the prosecution's ability to maintain the integrity of its case. This change reflects a broader understanding of the roles that certain individuals play in supporting the prosecution, especially in complex cases that involve non-human parties or entities. The bill applies to proceedings that commence after its effective date, indicating attention to future cases and their procedural conduct.

Summary

SB406 is an act that proposes an amendment to Article 36.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This amendment allows a prosecuting attorney to designate an individual who is an officer or employee of a party that is not a natural person to serve as the state's courtroom representative in a criminal proceeding. This means that such designated individuals cannot be excluded from hearings based on existing rules governing witness exclusion, specifically Rule 614 of the Texas Rules of Evidence.

Conclusion

If passed, SB406 would not only modify procedural norms within criminal proceedings in Texas but also potentially reshape the interaction between prosecutorial representation and witness testimony. As the legislature reviews this bill, the implications for both the defense and prosecution must be carefully considered, as they reflect on the rights of defendants and the efficacy of judicial processes.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB406 is the disapproval of Rule 614 to the extent that it allows for the exclusion of the designated courtroom representative. Critics may argue that this provision could undermine the purpose of excluding witnesses to prevent contamination of testimonies and influence over the jury. The balance between fair trial rights and the prosecutorial need for representative presence could spark debate among legal experts and stakeholders.

Companion Bills

TX HB2999

Identical Relating to the exclusion of certain witnesses during a criminal proceeding.

Previously Filed As

TX HB1764

Relating to the exclusion of certain witnesses during a criminal proceeding.

TX SB2041

Relating to the manner in which certain criminal proceedings are conducted.

TX HB4622

Relating to the manner in which certain criminal and juvenile proceedings are conducted.

TX HB3400

Relating to the release of defendants on bail, the duties of a magistrate in certain criminal proceedings, and the appointment of certain criminal law hearing officers; creating a criminal offense.

TX SB793

Relating to criminal asset forfeiture proceedings and the seizure and forfeiture of certain property.

TX HB908

Relating to the sealing of and discovery procedures relating to certain recordings of children constituting evidence in a criminal case in a criminal hearing or proceeding; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB720

Relating to allowing therapy or facility dogs to accompany a child or a person with a disability during testimony in certain criminal cases.

TX SB139

Relating to allowing therapy or facility dogs to accompany a child or a person with a disability during testimony in certain criminal cases.

TX HB4699

Relating to the appointment of an attorney pro tem for certain criminal proceedings.

TX HB5277

Relating to public access to criminal proceedings.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.