Texas Senate Bill SB749

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/28/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/4/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/13/09
• Voted on by House: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/26/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the powers and duties of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 163; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The proposed bill is expected to significantly impact state laws concerning municipal utility districts by expanding their financial authority. By allowing the district to impose taxes and issue bonds without the usual requirements of seeking approval from state environmental authorities, SB749 aims to simplify and accelerate the process of road construction and improvement within its jurisdiction. This could potentially lead to expedited infrastructure projects that are crucial for local residents and businesses.

Summary

SB749 pertains to the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 163 and aims to enhance its powers and duties, specifically in the areas of road construction and utility service provision. The bill grants the district the authority to impose a tax and issue bonds to fund road projects, which could include the development of paved roads and storm drainage systems. This legislative move seeks to streamline the financial mechanisms available to the district while enabling it to undertake essential infrastructure improvements that are vital to the community's growth and maintenance.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, the bill may generate some contention among local stakeholders. Critics might raise concerns regarding the limited checks and balances that come with the district’s newfound powers, especially related to taxing authority and bond issuance. The elimination of certain regulatory approvals could lead to debate about the implications for environmental oversight and community input into significant local projects. Understanding the balance between the need for infrastructure development and the preservation of local governance will be crucial as the bill progresses.