Texas Senate Bill SB929

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/15/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/23/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/1/09
• Voted on by House: 5/15/09
• Governor Action: 5/27/09
• Enrolled: 5/18/09
• Passed: 5/27/09

Caption

Relating to the powers and duties of the Sienna Plantation Municipal Utility District No. 4; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill also stipulates that the district must adhere to construction standards and regulations dictated by relevant municipalities or counties, establishing a framework where local governance plays a crucial role in road project oversight. By granting the district the right to issue bonds payable partially through ad valorem taxes, the bill aims to facilitate funding for essential infrastructure improvements without necessitating large upfront costs. However, the issuance of such bonds must receive approval from a two-thirds majority of the district voters, thereby promoting democratic engagement in local financial decisions.

Summary

SB929 aims to define and enhance the powers and duties of the Sienna Plantation Municipal Utility District No. 4. The bill provides the district with the authority to impose a tax and issue bonds to finance the construction, acquisition, improvement, operation, or maintenance of road projects, including storm drainage systems. This legislative move reflects a concerted effort to support local infrastructure development, ensuring that necessary resources are available for these projects in the District.

Contention

While the enhancements to the district's authority intend to streamline local infrastructure development, there may be contention regarding the economic implications of tax imposition on residents within the district. Critics could argue that increased taxes might burden local taxpayers, while proponents would likely advocate for the long-term benefits of improved infrastructure leading to enhanced property values and community wellbeing. This highlighted tension between fiscal responsibility and infrastructural necessity forms the core of the discussion surrounding SB929.