Acquisition and use of facial recognition technology by government entities prohibited.
Impact
If enacted, HF3146 could significantly alter the landscape of public safety measures in the state. It would ban law enforcement and other governmental agencies from utilizing facial recognition technology either directly or through agreements with private entities. This restriction is expected to limit the methods available to law enforcement for identifying suspects and monitoring public spaces, all while aiming to safeguard public trust and privacy. Furthermore, any data previously collected using such technology under unlawful circumstances would have to be discarded.
Summary
House File 3146 prohibits the acquisition and use of facial recognition technology by government entities in Minnesota. The bill aims to address growing concerns over privacy rights and government surveillance, foregrounding the potential misuse of face surveillance systems. By enacting this legislation, Minnesota would be taking a definitive stance on protecting citizens from what some views as invasive technology that could infringe upon individual liberties and civil rights.
Contention
The bill has sparked debate among lawmakers and the public regarding the balance between public safety and individual privacy rights. Proponents of HF3146 argue that face surveillance systems can lead to wrongful accusations and profiling, negatively impacting vulnerable communities. On the other hand, critics highlight concerns that banning such technology could hinder law enforcement's ability to conduct effective investigations and respond to crime, raising questions about the potential consequences for public safety and resource allocation in law enforcement operations.
Government entities request or obtaining of reverse-location information prohibition, use of reverse location information in a court action prohibition, and court order issued by court to obtain reverse location data prohibition
Government entities prohibited from requesting or obtaining reverse-location information, reverse-location information use in criminal action prohibited, court order prohibited, and civil cause of action provided.