In support of the indigent, further providing for definitions and for relatives' liability and procedure.
Impact
The amendments proposed by SB630 impact how relatives are held legally responsible for the support of indigent persons, which can significantly affect the financial obligations of many families in Pennsylvania. By defining the conditions under which a child can be relieved of support duties, the bill potentially provides relief to individuals who have been estranged from their parents for a decade. This change could lead to fewer burdens on the courts regarding enforcement of support obligations and may influence how families plan their financial futures in light of estrangements.
Summary
Senate Bill 630 seeks to amend Title 23 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, specifically addressing support obligations for indigent persons. The bill modifies the definition of 'department' to refer to the Department of Human Services and introduces provisions defining who is liable for the support of indigent individuals. Notably, it establishes that individuals who are 18 years or older and have not had contact with their indigent parent for ten years will not be required to provide financial support. This change aims to alleviate the burden of support obligations on individuals who have lost contact with non-dependent parents.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among advocates for indigent rights and those concerned with fair treatment of estranged relatives. Proponents argue that it recognizes the complexities of familial relationships and offers a compassionate approach to financial obligations, particularly for individuals who have not maintained contact with their indigent parent. Conversely, there may be concerns raised about the implications for children who may have a moral obligation to support their parents but may feel justified in severing ties due to past grievances.
Contention
While the bill presents a potential facilitation of support obligations, it may also lead to contention regarding its interpretation and implementation. Critics may argue that the ten-year contact clause sets a high threshold, which could allow some individuals to escape support responsibilities unjustly. The bill does not deeply explore cases of abandonment or estrangement that could be more nuanced, possibly leaving a gap in support for those who genuinely need assistance from estranged family members. This aspect could invoke discussions on familial duties, societal responsibility toward indigent citizens, and the broader implications of governmental support systems.
In firearms and other dangerous articles, further providing for licenses, providing for liability insurance and further providing for sale or transfer of firearms.
In interpretation and definitions, further providing for definitions; and, in liability and compensation, providing for compensation for post-traumatic stress injury.
In support matters generally, further providing for support guideline; and, in child custody, further providing for definitions, for award of custody and for presumption in cases concerning primary physical custody.
In preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions and providing for disaster emergency declaration and for testing requirement, duty to report and public access; in powers and duties, further providing for powers and duties of department; and, in liability and settlement procedures, further providing for responsible person.
Further providing for definitions and for powers and duties of the commission; providing for policies and procedures; and establishing the Human Relations Training Fund.