Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB679

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/28/25
• Refer: 4/28/25

Caption

In preliminary provisions, providing for minimum hourly wage or living wage for education support professionals; in duties and powers of boards of school directors, further providing for majority vote required and recording; and imposing duties on the Department of Labor and Industry.

Impact

The bill aims to create a more equitable pay structure for education support professionals, who often play vital roles in facilitating educational processes but frequently earn less than their counterparts in other professional sectors. The introduction of this wage floor is expected to increase the overall salary structure within public school entities and can lead to improved job satisfaction and retention among support staff. Additionally, it ensures that existing employment contracts will not be undermined by the new wage standards, allowing for a transitional phase as the law comes into effect.

Summary

Senate Bill 679 seeks to significantly improve the compensation for education support professionals in Pennsylvania by establishing a minimum hourly wage of $20 or a designated living wage, whichever is greater. This new compensation policy is designed to take effect beginning in the 2025-2026 school year, marking a critical shift aimed at improving the financial well-being of those working within the educational sector. The bill further stipulates that overtime must be compensated at a rate of one and a half times the established minimum wage, enhancing the financial protections available to this workforce.

Sentiment

The reception of SB 679 within the legislature and among stakeholders has been largely supportive, with advocates emphasizing the need for fair compensation in the education sector. Proponents argue that improving wages will ultimately benefit students by enabling schools to retain qualified personnel who provide critical support services. However, concerns have been raised about the fiscal implications for school districts, particularly regarding funding and budget adjustments needed to comply with the new wage requirements.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB 679 largely centers on the affordability and implementation timelines set within the bill. Critics, including some fiscal conservatives, express worries about the long-term financial impacts on school budgets and whether the state funding mechanisms would sufficiently support the increased wage costs. The bill also introduces new procedural requirements for school boards regarding majority voting on contracts that pertain to the employment of education support professionals, potentially complicating existing hiring and financial practices.