New York Assembly Bill A08153

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/2/25
• Refer: 5/2/25
• Report Pass: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/6/25
• Report Pass: 5/27/25
• Engrossed: 5/27/25
• Refer: 5/27/25
• Engrossed: 6/9/25
• Enrolled: 6/18/25
• Chaptered: 6/20/25
• Chaptered: 6/18/25
• Passed: 6/20/25
• Passed: 6/18/25

Caption

Extends certain provisions of law relating to value limitations for certain emergency contracts for public works or the purchase of supplies.

Impact

The extension of these provisions under A08153 is significant for state procurement practices and emergency response management. By maintaining existing provisions that limit the value of contracts for emergency situations, the bill ensures that necessary projects can be executed swiftly and efficiently, fostering a proactive approach to public safety and infrastructure maintenance. This could potentially enhance the state's ability to deal with unforeseen crises, whether natural disasters or public emergencies, thus reflecting a commitment to robust public service and efficient resource management.

Summary

Bill A08153 aims to amend certain provisions of the public buildings law, specifically extending value limitations on contracts related to emergency public works and the purchase of supplies. Originally established by chapter 674 of the laws of 1993, this legislation is crucial in defining the amount that can be allocated for emergency contracts, ensuring that the state can respond promptly to public needs without excessive bureaucratic delays. The amendment updates the expiration date for these provisions, seeking to prolong their applicability until June 30, 2028.

Contention

Discussion surrounding A08153 may reveal varying perspectives on the implications of extending value limitations for emergency contracts. Proponents might argue that such limitations are essential for preventing financial abuse and ensuring accountability in procurement processes. On the other hand, critics could express concern about whether these limits could hinder swift action in emergencies, or if they could create an inadequate response framework for public agencies that need flexibility in catastrophic scenarios. Thus, the bill poses a balancing act between regulatory oversight and operational effectiveness.