Minnesota House Bill HF3306

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/7/25
• Refer: 5/7/25

Caption

Water safety instruction required in health curriculum.

Impact

The enactment of HF3306 could lead to significant improvements in child safety regarding water-related incidents. By embedding water safety instruction into the school curriculum, the bill aims to create a safer environment for children, potentially reducing drowning rates in Minnesota. Schools will need to ensure that trained staff lead swim instruction and that the program addresses various barriers that might inhibit student participation. Moreover, the bill allows for parental opt-out under certain conditions, ensuring consideration for children's individual circumstances.

Summary

House File 3306 (HF3306) proposes amendments to Minnesota Statutes by requiring the inclusion of water safety instruction in the health curriculum for schools. Specifically, it mandates that all public school districts incorporate age-appropriate water safety training designed to reduce the risk of drowning among students. The bill emphasizes the importance of providing swim instruction at a young age, mandating at least eight weeks of swimming lessons for third graders in schools that have access to swimming pools. This initiative is aimed at equipping children with essential swimming skills and knowledge of water safety from an early age.

Contention

While HF3306 has the potential to significantly benefit students, there are points of contention regarding its implementation. Critics may raise concerns about schools' capacity to effectively deliver swim instruction, especially in relation to funding, staffing, and resources. Additionally, the requirement for schools to develop a culturally responsive curriculum could pose challenges, as administrators must navigate various financial, social, and emotional factors that affect students' willingness to participate. Opponents might argue that local control is essential in how districts develop these programs and that mandatory state-wide standards could overlook unique community needs.