Texas Senate Bill SB1787

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to educator preparation programs and educator certification, performance, and recruitment.

Impact

The proposed changes are significant in reshaping how educator preparation programs operate, particularly by setting measurable accountability standards based on performance indicators such as certification examination results and the effectiveness of beginning teachers in improving student achievement. With these standards, the bill reflects a commitment to ensuring that educators are not only well-qualified but also supported in their professional development throughout their initial years in the field. Notably, the bill also emphasizes the importance of diversity in program selection and implementation, aiming to recruit individuals from varied backgrounds to enrich the teaching profession.

Summary

SB1787 addresses critical aspects of educator preparation programs and educator certification processes in Texas. The bill proposes amendments to existing education code, including the introduction of fees for the issuance and maintenance of educator certificates, as well as requirements for the approval and renewal of educator preparation programs. By establishing clear criteria for program admission and the continuous evaluation of program performance, the legislation aims to enhance the quality of educators entering the profession. This focus on quality is expected to contribute positively to student outcomes across the state.

Contention

While the bill purports to enhance educator effectiveness and accountability, it raises concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential burden it may place on educator preparation programs, particularly smaller or alternative programs that may struggle to meet the new criteria. Critics argue that the financial implications of additional fees could deter prospective educators from entering the field, particularly in underserved subject areas like mathematics and science. Moreover, the requirement for disaggregated performance data may pose challenges in maintaining confidentiality while also ensuring accountability.