Us Congress House Bill HB3661

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/29/25
• Refer: 5/29/25

Caption

Extreme Weather and Heat Response Modernization Act

Impact

The enactment of HB 3661 is expected to lead to significant modifications in current state and federal emergency management practices. By mandating studies on the impact of extreme temperatures on health, infrastructure, and communities, the bill aims to enhance disaster readiness and response systems at multiple levels. Particular emphasis will be on vulnerable populations and disadvantaged communities, ensuring that the mitigation strategies take their unique circumstances into account. Additionally, the bill promotes the establishment of community cooling and resilience centers, which play a critical role in public safety during extreme weather incidents.

Summary

House Bill 3661, known as the Extreme Weather and Heat Response Modernization Act, directs the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to enhance the responsiveness and preparedness regarding extreme weather events, specifically focusing on both extreme heat and extreme cold incidents. The bill entails convening an advisory panel to assist in evaluating existing incident period definitions for emergencies declared under the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. This approach aims to provide better frameworks for declaring and responding to disasters, allowing for improvements in existing protocols and recommendations for future preparedness efforts.

Contention

During discussions over HB 3661, notable points of contention arose regarding the allocation of resources and the efficacy of current emergency management strategies. Critics argue that the proposed changes might not adequately address systemic issues in how FEMA and local governments respond to disasters, while supporters maintain that the enhancements in preparedness protocols will significantly benefit communities suffering from the adverse effects of climate change. The necessity for a balanced approach that considers both immediate emergency response needs and long-term preventative measures remains a critical aspect of the ongoing debate surrounding the bill.