Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB783

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/3/25

Caption

Establishing tourism improvement districts and tourism improvement district management associations; and providing for powers of counties, for powers of tourism improvement district management associations, for dissolution of tourism improvement district and for annual audit.

Impact

Upon enactment, SB783 will allow counties to impose special assessment fees on businesses within the TIDs, which will fund various tourism activities and improvements as outlined in a district's plan. This can enhance local economies by promoting tourism and making the area more attractive to visitors. However, it also obligates counties to maintain existing levels of funding for tourism to prevent a reduction in support purely due to the establishment of a TID. These measures aim to create a sustainable tourism environment that benefits both the local community and the businesses involved.

Summary

Senate Bill 783, known as the Tourism Improvement District Act, aims to establish tourism improvement districts (TIDs) within counties across Pennsylvania. The bill empowers counties to create these districts, which are geographically defined areas that focus on enhancing tourism-related activities and benefits for businesses operating within them. The legislation sets forth procedures for the establishment, management, and dissolution of TIDs, ensuring that the interests of benefited businesses are represented in any planning and operational framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB783 appears generally supportive, particularly among those in the tourism and hospitality industries. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate better funding for tourism initiatives, which are vital for local businesses. However, there are underlying concerns about how the fees might affect smaller businesses that may struggle with additional costs. Some stakeholders also express apprehension regarding the management of funds raised from the special assessments, seeking assurances that they will be used efficiently and for intended purposes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the governance structures proposed for the management of TIDs. Critics highlight the necessity of transparency and accountability in how special assessment funds are utilized and the workflow for allowing input from affected businesses. The concern is that without stringent oversight, the funds may not serve their intended function effectively. Moreover, some opponents question the fairness of assessing fees on businesses that might not benefit equally from the district’s enhancements or activities.