New York Assembly Bill A08790

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/5/25
• Refer: 6/5/25

Caption

Prohibits off-track betting corporation vehicles from being used as take-home vehicles by board members, officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, or agents of such corporation or by certain family members of such individuals; provides an exception therefor.

Impact

The enforcement of A08790 would introduce stricter regulations regarding the administration of off-track betting corporations, ultimately aiming to enhance transparency and prevent any ethical conflicts of interest that might arise from granting board members or staff the privilege of using corporate vehicles for personal use. The requirement for a written policy on take-home vehicles that must comply with the state comptroller's rules adds an additional layer of oversight to these corporations, ensuring that their operations remain accountable to the public. Furthermore, the bill provides a structured framework for exceptions, which would need to be approved and subjected to random audits by the gaming commission.

Summary

Bill A08790 proposes to amend the racing, pari-mutuel wagering, and breeding laws in New York by prohibiting regional off-track betting corporations from using their vehicles as take-home vehicles for board members, officers, or employees. This measure targets the potential misuse of public resources by ensuring that vehicles owned or leased by such corporations are utilized solely for official business. The bill emphasizes that these vehicles must be returned to corporation property when not actively in use for work purposes, thereby enhancing accountability in the operation of public funds and resources.

Contention

While proponents of A08790 argue that the bill represents a necessary step toward ethical governance in public entities, critics might contend that such regulations could create undue restrictions on corporate practices and impair the operational flexibility of off-track betting corporations. The debate could center around whether such measures are adequately addressing issues of ethics and accountability or if they are overly burdensome on the management of these organizations. Additionally, the bill's provisions for exceptions and audits may be viewed differently across the political spectrum, with some advocating for greater leniency and others calling for enforced strict adherence to public accountability standards.