New York Assembly Bill A08834

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/9/25
• Refer: 6/9/25

Caption

Limits the authority of cities, villages and towns to impose certain zoning regulations, ordinances, or local laws which would have the effect of reducing the number or density of allowable housing units in the area subject to the regulations, ordinances, or local laws.

Impact

If passed, A08834 would have a significant impact on local regulatory powers concerning housing development. It prohibits local governments from enacting or modifying any regulations that would diminish housing unit density, effectively centralizing authority around maintaining or increasing housing availability. This change is intended to address the growing housing crisis in New York, where many urban areas are struggling with affordability and insufficient housing supply. Proponents of the bill believe that easing zoning restrictions will facilitate the development of more housing units, particularly in urban centers facing a housing shortage.

Summary

Bill A08834, named the 'REZO-NY' act, seeks to amend the General City Law, Village Law, and Town Law in New York to reform exclusionary zoning ordinances. The primary objective of this legislation is to limit the ability of cities, villages, and towns to impose zoning regulations that would result in a reduction of the number or density of allowable housing units in their regions. By doing so, the bill aims to combat restrictive zoning practices that some local governments utilize to maintain lower density levels in their communities, ostensibly to preserve property values and community character.

Contention

Despite its intentions, Bill A08834 is likely to encounter contention from various stakeholders. Critics may argue that the legislation undermines local autonomy, stripping communities of the ability to make zoning decisions tailored to their specific needs and characteristics. Local officials might express concerns that mandated increases in housing density could lead to overcrowding, alter the community’s character, or strain existing infrastructure and services. As a result, while the bill seeks to address pressing housing issues, it could provoke significant debate regarding the balance between state intervention and local governance.