Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB823

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/18/25
• Refer: 6/18/25

Caption

In revenues, further providing for transfers from State Gaming Fund.

Impact

The proposed changes in SB 823 would facilitate more robust local efforts to crack down on illegal gambling activities that may often go unchecked due to resource constraints. By earmarking state funds specifically for law enforcement, the bill intends to enhance local capabilities to address gambling violations effectively. This could lead to a potential decrease in unlawful gambling operations, contributing positively to public safety and community well-being.

Summary

Senate Bill 823 aims to amend Title 4 (Amusements) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes specifically related to the distribution of funds from the State Gaming Fund. Under this bill, the Legislature seeks to ensure that annual transfers of $2,000,000 are allocated to the board responsible for granting financial assistance to local law enforcement agencies. The purpose of these grants is to support the investigation and enforcement of laws concerning unlawful gambling practices across the Commonwealth, including related activities such as animal fighting and the possession of paraphernalia for such purposes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 823 has been generally supportive among lawmakers and advocacy groups focused on gambling regulation. Proponents view the bill as a necessary measure to enhance law enforcement resources which will better tackle unlawful gambling issues. While there has been some opposition related to broader discussions on gambling policies in Pennsylvania, the focus on law enforcement grants seems to evoke a consensus among stakeholders concerned with crime prevention.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the effectiveness of such grants in actually curbing illegal gambling activity versus relying on traditional enforcement measures. Some critics argue that merely providing funding does not address underlying issues that allow for such illegal activities to thrive. Additionally, there may be debates regarding how equitably the funds will be distributed among various local law enforcement agencies, particularly in areas that already face significant budgetary challenges.