Michigan House Bill HB4694

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/26/25
• Refer: 6/26/25
• Report Pass: 9/3/25
• Engrossed: 9/18/25

Caption

Local government: authorities; revisions to the recreational authorities act; provide for. Amends secs. 5, 7, 9, 11 & 21 of 2000 PA 321 (MCL 123.1135 et seq.) & adds sec. 10. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4798'25, HB 4695'25

Impact

If passed, HB 4694 will enable municipalities more extensive control over recreational resources, allowing them to better coordinate the development and management of public amenities. It also provides a framework for the levying of taxes to fund these initiatives, requiring approval from the electorate. This localized control can enhance community engagement and ensure that recreational facilities reflect the specific needs and preferences of community members, potentially leading to improved public health and social cohesion.

Summary

House Bill 4694 seeks to amend the Recreational Authorities Act to allow for changes in how recreational authorities are established and function within municipalities in Michigan. This legislation permits one or more municipalities to establish a recreational authority, which serves as a governmental subdivision for the purpose of promoting public recreation facilities such as swimming pools, parks, and community centers. The bill outlines the necessary steps for the establishment of such an authority, including the requirement for articles of incorporation and a defined territory of operation.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 4694 is largely supportive among proponents who value the enhanced capability it offers municipalities to cater to local recreational needs. They argue that it is a positive step towards community empowerment and improved quality of life through the establishment of more public recreation spaces. However, there are concerns among critics regarding the possible financial implications of new tax levies and whether such powers may lead to disparities in access to recreational facilities, particularly in less affluent municipalities.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 4694 is the governance structure of the recreational authorities it establishes. Critics express concerns over the accountability of such authorities and their ability to manage funds responsibly. Additionally, there is debate about the potential inequities that may arise if wealthier municipalities are better able to leverage these authorities for their benefit, leaving poorer areas at a disadvantage regarding public recreation services.