Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a student member of the board of regents of a state institution of higher education or state university system to serve a term that differs from the terms served by the other members of the board.
Impact
If enacted, SJR12 would amend Section 30a, Article XVI of the Texas Constitution to accommodate terms for student representatives on educational boards that may be shorter than the standard six-year terms that other board members serve. This change reflects an understanding of the unique nature of student experiences and needs, allowing institutions to prioritize contemporary student representation without being bound by the extended terms set for other members. It promotes engagement and responsiveness to the current student body’s priorities and concerns.
Summary
SJR12 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that allows a student member of the board of regents of a state institution of higher education or state university system to serve a term that differs from the terms of the other members of the board. The intention behind this amendment is to provide flexibility in student participation on boards that govern higher education, thus ensuring that current student voices can be represented more effectively. By permitting varying term lengths, the bill aims to facilitate a more dynamic involvement of students in the governance of their institutions.
Contention
The proposal may face debate over balancing the interests of long-term institutional governance with the necessity of vibrant, current student input. Supporters argue that such representation is vital for addressing the immediate and evolving issues students face. Critics might contend that shorter terms could lead to instability on the board, potentially disrupting long-term planning and consistency in policy decisions. This tension illustrates the complexities involved in integrating student perspectives while maintaining effective governance structures.
Voting_history
As indicated in the bill's documentation, the last action taken was on April 15, 2009, when no further action was recorded in committee. The timeline is essential as it suggests a lack of movement toward enactment, highlighting possible concerns or opposition surrounding the proposed changes that may have prevented advancement through the legislative process.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to entitle all component institutions of The Texas A&M University System and The University of Texas System to participate in the income and other benefits of the permanent university fund.
Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of funds to support the capital needs of educational programs offered by the Texas State Technical College System and certain component institutions of the Texas State University System and repealing the limitation on the allocation to the Texas State Technical College System and its campuses of the annual appropriation of certain constitutionally dedicated funding for public institutions of higher education.
Relating to the creation of a new university in Nacogdoches, Texas, within The University of Texas System and the allocation of the annual constitutional appropriation to certain agencies and institutions of higher education; abolishing Stephen F. Austin State University.
Relating to the creation of a new university in Nacogdoches, Texas, within The University of Texas System and the allocation of the annual constitutional appropriation to certain agencies and institutions of higher education; abolishing Stephen F. Austin State University.
Proposing a constitutional amendment creating a university research fund to support emerging research universities in The University of Texas System or The Texas A&M University System and disqualifying all component institutions of those university systems from receiving money from the national research university fund.
Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to the Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of higher education to achieve national prominence as major research universities and drive the state economy.
Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to the Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of higher education to achieve national prominence as major research universities and drive the state economy.
Proposing a constitutional amendment reducing The University of Texas System's share of the income and other benefits of the permanent university fund, transferring to the national research university fund and general revenue fund a portion of the annual distribution made from the permanent university fund to the available university fund, appropriating the portion transferred to the national research university fund, and dedicating the portion transferred to the general revenue fund to provide for the support and maintenance of public institutions of higher education.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require the legislature to appropriate funds to state institutions of higher education to fund certain education benefits provided to veterans and family members of veterans.