Us Congress House Bill HJR104

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/10/25
• Refer: 7/10/25

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

Impact

The passage of HJR104 would prevent the enforcement of the aforementioned BLM rule, which may affect how land resources are managed in the designated area. This congressional disapproval would mean that the rule would have no force or effect, leading to the possibility that local policies and management plans would revert to previous regulations, potentially altering how land use and resource management are conducted. Such legislative actions are critical as they can shape the regulatory landscape surrounding land management, especially in regions that rely heavily on federal frameworks for local decisions.

Summary

HJR104 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) concerning the 'Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment.' This action is taken under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code, which governs the Congressional Review Act. The resolution seeks to negate the rule established by the BLM, which was issued on November 20, 2024, and is perceived as having significant implications on local land management strategies within the jurisdiction of the Miles City Field Office.

Contention

Debate surrounding HJR104 may arise from differing views on federal versus local management of land resources. Proponents of the resolution are likely to argue that the BLM's rule imposes undue regulations that could hinder local decision-making processes and resources. Conversely, opponents may contend that such federal rules are essential for ensuring sustainable management practices and protecting environmental resources. The resolution can be seen as a part of the broader discourse on how federal authority interacts with state and local governance in land management contexts.