Us Congress House Bill HB4602

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/22/25
• Refer: 7/22/25

Caption

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act

Impact

Should HB 4602 be enacted, it would significantly enhance judicial safety protocols by providing technical assistance and training for state and local judges, courts, and law enforcement agencies. The bill emphasizes the importance of developing state-specific security measures, including physical security assessments and educational programs for judicial officers. Moreover, it would establish a national database for reporting and sharing information on threats to judicial safety, which could improve responsive actions and resource allocation concerning judicial security.

Remark

Overall, HB 4602 signifies an important step towards addressing current threats faced by the judiciary and reinforcing the safety environment within which judges operate. By establishing structured support and resources for judicial security, the bill aims to mitigate risks that judicial officers encounter while performing their official duties.

Summary

House Bill 4602, known as the 'Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act,' aims to amend the State Justice Institute Act of 1984. It seeks to authorize the State Justice Institute to provide financial and technical support to eligible organizations for the establishment of a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center. The center would focus on promoting judicial security and enhancing the safety of judges and court staff across state and local jurisdictions. The proposed legislation reflects growing concerns over the safety and security of judicial officers in light of increasing threats and attacks against them.

Contention

While the bill seems to receive bipartisan support for its intent to protect judges, it raises questions regarding the implementation and effectiveness of the proposed security measures. Critics may argue about operational feasibility and potential overreach in judicial security protocols. Furthermore, concerns around privacy and the sharing of threat information could also arise, as collaboration between various law enforcement agencies necessitates careful handling of sensitive data related to judicial activities.