Michigan House Bill HB4707

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/1/25
• Refer: 7/1/25
• Report Pass: 8/19/25
• Engrossed: 8/20/25

Caption

Elections: voting procedures; ranked choice voting; prohibit. Amends 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.1 - 168.992) by adding sec. 642e.

Impact

If enacted, HB4707 would significantly impact how local elections are conducted in Michigan, solidifying traditional voting methods over modern alternatives like ranked choice voting. Supporters of the bill argue that it preserves a straightforward electoral process, while critics contend that it undermines potential reforms that could benefit voters by allowing them to express preferences for multiple candidates rather than relying on a single choice. The implications of this bill may alter the landscape of local voting systems, specifically in communities that have expressed interest in or have implemented ranked choice voting procedures.

Summary

House Bill 4707 proposes an amendment to the Michigan Election Law of 1954, specifically introducing section 642e. This section explicitly prohibits the state, cities, and townships from conducting elections using ranked choice voting. It aims to maintain a traditional voting system that does not allow voters to rank candidates based on their preferences. The prohibition extends to any local laws or ordinances that may seek to authorize such voting methods, declaring any such contrary laws void and unenforceable. The bill is positioned against the backdrop of an increasing interest in ranked choice voting as a method that could enhance electoral fairness and representation.

Contention

The introduction of HB4707 has sparked discussions about the balance between state regulation and local autonomy. Proponents believe that maintaining a uniform election process helps safeguard against confusion and complexity in electoral administration. Conversely, opponents argue that it restricts local governments' ability to address their unique electoral concerns and desires for reform. This conflict highlights the ongoing debate about governance and the extent to which state laws should dictate local election procedures.