Pennsylvania House Bill HB1853

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/9/25
• Refer: 9/9/25

Caption

Further providing for legislative intent, for definitions, for license required, for State Board of Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists and Professional Counselors, for powers and functions of board, for qualifications for license, for procedures for licensing, for reciprocity, for endorsement of out-of-State licenses and for reinstatement of license; providing for restrictions on use of title "Licensed Recreational Therapist"; and further providing for penalties, for license renewal and records and fees and for unlawful practice.

Impact

By clarifying legislative intent and definitions, HB1853 affects how social work and counseling practices are governed, ensuring that only qualified individuals can operate as licensed professionals. Notably, the bill introduces provisions for reciprocity in licensing, allowing professionals licensed in other states to practice in Pennsylvania under specific conditions. This could potentially facilitate the movement of professionals across state lines, improving the availability of qualified therapists to meet local needs.

Summary

House Bill 1853 aims to amend the existing Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists, and Professional Counselors Act in Pennsylvania. The bill proposes revisions to enhance the licensing and regulatory framework surrounding various forms of therapy practice, including social work, marriage and family therapy, and recreational therapy. It establishes clearer definitions, operational procedures for licensing, and reinforces the necessity of licensure for practitioners, thus prioritizing the protection of public safety and welfare in the state.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB1853 exhibit a predominantly supportive sentiment among proponents who view the amendments as necessary for upholding professional standards and safeguarding public interests. However, there are concerns regarding the implications of stringent licensing practices, particularly for those wishing to enter the profession. Advocates for more accessible pathways into counseling and therapy argue that the bill, while well-intentioned, might restrict entry for new professionals, thereby exacerbating existing shortages in the mental health field.

Contention

One notable point of contention within the discussions of HB1853 is the emphasis on regulatory control versus professional accessibility. Critics argue that while ensuring public safety is important, over-regulation can discourage talented individuals from pursuing careers in fields that are already in high demand. Moreover, the bill's provisions for penalties and civil remedies against unlicensed practice raise questions about the balance needed between protecting the public and allowing for reasonable access to therapeutic services.