Michigan House Bill HB4980

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/18/25
• Refer: 9/18/25

Caption

Weapons: licensing; license to carry a concealed pistol; modify requirement to file in county of residence. Amends secs. 5b & 5l of 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.425b & 28.425l).

Impact

The proposed amendments may significantly influence the landscape of firearm regulations in Michigan, particularly concerning the ease of obtaining a concealed carry license. While supporters argue that making the process more accessible will empower law-abiding citizens to exercise their rights, critics express concerns about the potential implications for public safety. They worry that by reducing the regulatory burden, there may be a greater risk of licenses being issued to individuals with disqualifying backgrounds, undermining the intent of existing firearms laws designed to protect the public.

Summary

House Bill 4980 aims to amend existing laws related to the licensing for carrying concealed pistols in the state of Michigan, specifically targeting sections of the 1927 PA 372. The bill proposes modifications to the process by which individuals apply for a concealed pistol license, including provisions that streamline certain requirements for applicants. It mandates that individuals must apply in the county where they reside, and includes various conditions under which applications may be expedited or waived, particularly in emergency situations. The changes are designed to enhance access to concealed carry licenses while ensuring background checks remain a central component of the approval process.

Contention

Controversy surrounding HB 4980 is likely to stem from its potential to shift the balance between individual rights and community safety. Opponents may argue that loosening licensing requirements could permit individuals with criminal histories or those flagged for mental health concerns to carry concealed weapons, potentially leading to increased gun-related incidents. Proponents, however, counter that current regulations are overly restrictive and hinder responsible individuals from obtaining necessary licenses, framing the discussion as one of personal freedom versus governmental oversight. Ultimately, the debate is expected to reflect deeper societal questions about the role of firearms in community safety and the rights of individuals.