Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring any increase in a franchise tax rate to be approved by two-thirds of all the members elected to each house of the legislature.
Impact
The passage of HJR18 would amend Article VIII of the Texas Constitution by adding Section 25, which specifically focuses on the legislative approval process for increases in franchise tax rates. This change could significantly impact the state's ability to adjust tax rates as needed for revenue generation, as any future increase would necessitate substantial legislative agreement. Consequently, this could limit fiscal policy flexibility for the state and may influence budget planning and financial management.
Summary
HJR18 proposes a constitutional amendment that mandates any increase in the franchise tax rate to be approved by a two-thirds majority of all elected members in both houses of the Texas legislature. This amendment aims to create a higher threshold for passing tax increases, making it more challenging to adjust franchise tax rates without significant legislative support. The intent is to provide taxpayers with increased protection against potential tax hikes, ensuring that such financial decisions require broader consensus among lawmakers.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HJR18 appears to be supportive among those who advocate for taxpayer protections and fiscal conservatism, as it aims to establish a rigorous process for tax increases. Proponents argue that this measure will enhance accountability in taxation and prevent hasty decisions that could burden taxpayers. However, there may be concerns among fiscal policymakers and some legislators who feel that this requirement could hinder necessary tax adjustments in response to changing economic conditions, leading to potential budgetary constraints.
Contention
Notable points of contention center around the impact of such a constitutional amendment on the state's ability to respond to fiscal emergencies or economic downturns. Opponents may argue that requiring a two-thirds majority could obstruct timely legislative responses that are essential for managing the state's finances effectively. Additionally, questions regarding the potential for increased partisan divides in the legislature could emerge, as achieving a two-thirds majority may become increasingly difficult in a politically polarized environment.
Duplicate
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring any increase in a franchise tax rate to be approved by two-thirds of all the members elected to each house of the legislature.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the governor to call the legislature into special session on petition of at least two-thirds of the members of each house of the legislature.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the lieutenant governor and speaker of the house of representatives to call the legislature into special session on petition of at least two-thirds of the members of each house of the legislature in response to a fiscal crisis, war, natural disaster, or emergency.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the legislature to increase the basic allotment under the Foundation School Program and to adjust the allotment in a manner that reflects annual inflation.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring elections on proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution to be held in November of even-numbered years.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to set the salaries of members of the legislature and the lieutenant governor based on the average public school teacher salary in this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the secretary of state to be elected by the qualified voters at a general election instead of appointed by the governor.