Applying to Congress to call a convention to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution to permit the repeal of federal law by two-thirds of the legislatures of the several states.
Impact
If enacted, the amendment proposed by HJR50 would have significant implications for federal statutory law, particularly concerning the autonomy of state legislatures. It would allow states, by a supermajority, to invalidate federal legislation, thereby empowering state governments to push back against what supporters view as federal overreach. This move is likely to encourage a more decentralized approach to governance, where states would have a greater role in legislative processes that affect their residents and jurisdictions. However, the enactment of such an amendment could lead to conflicts between federal and state law, impacting various sectors subject to federal regulations.
Summary
HJR50 is a joint resolution that applies to Congress for the calling of a convention to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution. Its primary aim is to permit the repeal of federal laws or regulations by a vote of two-thirds of the state legislatures. The resolution is grounded in the proponents' belief that the federal government has overstepped its constitutional authority, particularly citing concerns over federal mandates imposed on state and local governments without appropriate funding. The backers of this resolution argue that such encroachments need to be addressed through a formal amendment to restore the proper balance of power between state and federal governments.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HJR50 is polarized, reflecting broader national debates concerning state versus federal power. Supporters, mainly conservatives and libertarians, see it as an opportunity to enhance state sovereignty, arguing that local governments are better positioned to understand and respond to the needs of their communities. In contrast, critics assert that such a proposal could undermine the federal regulatory framework established for public health, safety, and welfare, exposing states to the potential pitfalls of a fragmented legal landscape that could endanger the rights and protections afforded at the federal level.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HJR50 involve the implications of allowing states to repeal federal laws. Proponents argue that this would serve as a check on federal authority and enable states to exercise greater control over their legislative agendas. Conversely, opponents raise concerns about the potential chaos this could unleash, particularly in areas that require national consistency, such as civil rights protections and environmental regulations. The discourse surrounding HJR50 encapsulates a critical debate on governance structure, where diverse viewpoints elucidate the potential benefits of greater state autonomy against the need for cohesive national standards.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Extending the deadline for the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing the Texas Redistricting Commission to redistrict the Texas Legislature and Texas congressional districts and revising procedures for redistricting.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing the Texas Redistricting Commission to redistrict the Texas Legislature, Texas congressional districts, and State Board of Education districts and revising procedures for redistricting.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing the Texas Independent Citizen Redistricting Commission to redistrict the Texas Legislature, Texas congressional districts, and State Board of Education districts and revising procedures for redistricting.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing the Texas Redistricting Commission to redistrict the Texas Legislature and Texas congressional districts and revising procedures for redistricting.
RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
Urging And Applying To The Congress Of The United States Under The Provisions Of Article V Of The Constitution Of The United States For The Calling Of A Convention Of The States, Limited To Proposing Amendments To The Constitution Of The United States That Limit The Terms Of Office For Officials Of The Federal Government And Members Of Congress.