Adopting procedures for the Committee of the Whole Senate during its consideration of Senate Bill 14.
Impact
The impact of SR79 is primarily procedural, as it outlines the operations and conduct of the Senate during its evaluation of SB14. By invoking the Committee of the Whole format, Senate members can engage more comprehensively with the bill, permitting testimony from interested parties. This process enhances transparency in the legislative review of significant bills, notably with those pertaining to voter policies, which can greatly influence electoral processes and public trust in government procedures.
Summary
Senate Resolution 79 (SR79) establishes procedures for the Committee of the Whole Senate during the consideration of Senate Bill 14, which pertains to voter identification requirements. This resolution is grounded in the Texas Constitution and Senate Rules, specifically noting provisions that allow the Senate to form a Committee of the Whole to discuss and review matters of public importance. SR79 specifies that the Senate shall convene as a Committee of the Whole to deliberate on SB14, thus streamlining discussions and ensuring accountability before final decisions are made on the bill.
Sentiment
Overall sentiment surrounding the resolution appears to be practical; legislators recognize the importance of organized deliberation on contentious topics such as voter identification. The move to utilize a Committee of the Whole indicates an effort to foster an inclusive environment where various stakeholders can present their views. However, underlying tensions related to voter regulations may still exist, potentially indicating divergent opinions on the specifics of SB14 itself.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise during the discussion of SB14 itself when the Committee of the Whole meets. While SR79 facilitates the discussion, it does not mitigate the debates that may characterize the bill itself, as voter identification laws are often polarizing in nature. Competing perspectives on voter access versus voter security are likely to fuel vigorous debates, which may shift the focus from the procedural aspects outlined in SR79 to the implications of the voter identification measures proposed in SB14.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing an independent redistricting commission to establish districts for the election of the members of the United States House of Representatives elected from this state, the Texas Senate, and the Texas House of Representatives.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing an independent redistricting commission to establish districts for the election of the members of the United States House of Representatives elected from this state, the Texas Senate, and the Texas House of Representatives.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.