Relating to the sale or lease of property by certain municipalities owning land near the shoreline of certain lakes.
Impact
This legislation is expected to significantly impact municipalities by providing them with greater flexibility in managing their landholdings near lakes. By removing the requirement for bidding and public notice, the bill aims to expedite the sale process, which could be particularly beneficial for municipalities looking to offload surplus property that may not be essential for public services. It also allows these municipalities to manage their real estate more efficiently, potentially increasing local government revenues through land sales. However, municipalities must still ensure that these lands are sold judiciously to protect public interests, especially regarding health, safety, and environmental concerns.
Summary
House Bill 844 amends the Local Government Code to facilitate the sale or lease of property by certain municipalities that own land situated near the shoreline of specified lakes. The primary change allows municipalities with a population of 825,000 or less to sell land within 5,000 feet of the shoreline of a lake, without the need for public notice or solicitation of bids, directly to the person currently leasing the land. This transaction must occur at fair market value, as determined by a certified appraiser, effectively streamlining the process for local governments wishing to divest property that may be of limited use while still ensuring transparency in property valuation.
Contention
While the bill may aid in land management for some municipalities, it raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and accountability in the property sale process. Critics may express concerns that this legislation could lead to less transparency and oversight, as the relaxed regulations could be perceived as favoring insiders—those who lease the land—over broader municipal interests. The provision that excludes sold properties from certain exemptions in the Water Code is particularly notable, aiming to safeguard municipal water supplies but potentially limiting the attractiveness of such land transactions.
Notable_provisions
An essential provision in this bill is its definition of 'lake', which is limited to inland bodies of standing water that have a storage capacity greater than 10,000 acre-feet. This specific definition confines the bill’s applicability, ensuring that it addresses only particular municipal situations. Additionally, if the bill is passed with a two-thirds majority vote in both legislative chambers, it will take effect immediately; otherwise, it will become law on September 1, 2011.
Relating to the powers and duties of Port Freeport; limiting the authority of certain municipalities to regulate land use by Port Freeport; and the creation of a reinvestment zone containing property owned by Port Freeport.
Relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district or similar preservation district by certain municipalities.
Relating to wrongful exclusion of handgun license holders from certain property owned by or leased to a governmental entity and to certain offenses relating to the carrying of handguns on that property.