Relating to allowing a governmental body to redact certain personal information under the public information law without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general and the calculation of certain deadlines under the public information law.
Impact
If enacted, HB1671 is expected to significantly affect the way personal data is handled within governmental transparency frameworks in Texas. By enabling agencies to act autonomously in redacting information deemed sensitive, the bill could lead to quicker responses for public information requests. It will also establish clearer guidelines for citizens seeking to challenge redactions, as individuals can appeal decisions made regarding withheld information directly to the attorney general. This could potentially increase public engagement and oversight on how personal information is managed by governmental entities.
Summary
House Bill 1671 seeks to streamline the regulation of public information requests in Texas by allowing governmental bodies to redact specific personal information without requiring prior approval from the attorney general. This bill amends Sections 552.130 and 552.136 of the Government Code, allowing agencies to make redactions based on defined parameters concerning personal information directly, thereby expediting the process of handling public records requests. The initiative aims to simplify the workload of governmental entities and enhance the efficiency of information management under public access laws.
Contention
Despite its intent to improve efficiency, there are concerns surrounding the implications of HB1671 on the principle of government transparency. Critics may argue that this bill could lead to excessive withholding of information and potentially limit public access to data intended to be freely available under public information laws. The potential for inconsistency in how individual agencies interpret the scope of personal information that can be redacted without further review may raise questions about accountability and compliance with public information expectations.
Identical
Relating to confidential information under the public information law and to procedures and deadlines under the public information law in relation to the redaction of certain confidential information by a governmental body.
Relating to an exception to required disclosure under the public information law for certain electronic information held by a prosecutor, law enforcement agency, or corrections agency.
Relating to allowing a governmental body to redact certain personal information under the public information law without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general and allowing information about a public officer or public employee to be withheld if disclosure would pose a substantial risk of physical harm.
Relating to confidential information under the public information law and to procedures and deadlines under the public information law in relation to the redaction of certain confidential information by a governmental body.