Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Impact
Should HJR102 pass, it would effectively repeal the existing constitutional definition of marriage in Texas. This move could align state law more closely with federal standards regarding marriage equality, particularly in light of recent Supreme Court rulings affirming the right to same-sex marriage. The repeal could lead to broader recognition of partnerships beyond traditional heterosexual marriage, impacting various domains such as family rights, inheritance, and taxation for same-sex couples and other similar relationships.
Summary
HJR102 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that seeks to repeal the current constitutional provision in Texas defining marriage strictly as the union between one man and one woman. The bill aims to eliminate this provision and restrict the state and its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing any legal status that is identical or similar to marriage. If enacted, the amendment would fundamentally change the legal landscape surrounding marriage in Texas, allowing for the potential recognition of same-sex unions and other forms of legal partnerships.
Sentiment
Sentiment surrounding HJR102 appears to be deeply divided. Proponents of the resolution argue it is a necessary step towards achieving equality and recognition for all forms of love and partnership, viewing the amendment as a matter of civil rights. Conversely, opponents, primarily from conservative and religious groups, contend that the bill represents a significant moral and social shift that undermines traditional family values, leading to potential pushback against its passage.
Contention
The notable contention surrounding HJR102 lies in the broader debate about marriage equality and the role of the state in regulating personal relationships. Advocates for the bill highlight the importance of inclusivity and equal rights, while detractors emphasize the traditional definition of marriage held by many in Texas. The proposal has sparked heated discussions in both legislative and public spheres about the future of marriage laws in the state, as well as the implications for local governance and parental rights.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Relating to the prohibition of face covering mandates by this state and political subdivisions of this state in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; providing exceptions.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to the identification of constitutional or statutory provisions of this state that have been invalidated or otherwise limited by a state appellate court.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision that prohibits the appropriation of state money or property for the benefit of any sect, religious society, or theological or religious seminary.