Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1746

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the participation by certain taxing units in tax increment financing and the payment of tax increments into the tax increment fund for a reinvestment zone.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1746 is projected to clarify and potentially enhance the efficacy of tax increment financing in Texas. By imposing clear deadlines and penalties, it encourages compliance among taxing units, thereby securing necessary funds for infrastructure and fiscal projects aimed at revitalizing local economies. It also allows for more flexibility with regard to other taxing units within the territorial jurisdictions established by cities or counties. The updating of this tax regulation could aid in mitigating issues related to financial delays that previously hampered development efforts in reinvestment zones, leading to more successful and timely completion of projects aimed at community enhancement.

Summary

House Bill 1746 revises the regulations concerning the participation of certain taxing units in tax increment financing (TIF) and the mechanisms for the payment of tax increments into the designated tax increment fund for reinvestment zones. The proposed changes focus on the deadlines for payments owed by taxing units following property tax delinquency and specify the conditions under which these payments can be made. This bill introduces strict penalties for late payments, establishing a five percent penalty and an annual interest rate of 10 percent on delinquent amounts. By altering the existing tax code, the bill aims to streamline the financing process for community development initiatives within designated reinvestment zones.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1746 appears to be largely supportive, particularly from municipal and development interests that see the potential for greater investment in local projects. Stakeholders such as city officials and urban planners may advocate for the bill due to its straightforward approach to enhancing TIF processes, believing that the new provisions will lead to more predictable funding streams for development initiatives. However, there may also be concerns raised by entities wary of stringent penalties and the implications for smaller taxing units that might struggle to comply with the new regulations, indicating a mixed reception in certain communities.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 1746 may arise from the implications of the penalties on smaller or financially constrained taxing units, which could potentially lead to unintended consequences such as diminished participation in TIF programs. Critics might argue that the aggressive penalties for delinquency could deter some taxing units from fully engaging in reinvestment zones or lead to adverse fiscal outcomes. Additionally, there may be inquiries into whether these amendments align with the goals of economic equity and access for all taxing units, particularly those that are less affluent. Overall, understanding how these changes will affect diverse financial landscapes across Texas will be key to evaluating the bill's effectiveness.

Companion Bills

TX SB627

Identical Relating to the participation by certain taxing units in tax increment financing and the payment of tax increments into the tax increment fund for a reinvestment zone.

Similar Bills

HI HB1457

Relating To Tax Increment Financing.

NM SB293

Housing Study For Some Development Projects

MN HF2006

Tax increment financing; use of unobligated increment clarified, and expiration extended.

MN SF2337

Unobligated tax increment use clarification

MN HF949

Tax increment financing; uses of unobligated increment clarified.

MN SF23

Unobligated increment uses clarification

MN HF3166

School district approval made a condition of establishing an economic development district.

NM SB482

State Fairgrounds Tidd