Relating to the holding of an interest in certain alcoholic beverage licenses, permits, or premises by certain persons whose alcoholic beverage license or permit has been revoked.
Impact
The enactment of HB2707 would create stricter regulations around the issuance of alcoholic beverage permits in Texas. The bill's intent is to ensure that the licensing process accounts for the safety of the community, reducing the likelihood of establishments with a history of violent incidents being able to serve alcohol. This law would impact a range of stakeholders, including bar and restaurant owners, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, and local communities, as it establishes new barriers to obtaining alcoholic beverage licenses in situations where public safety may be compromised.
Summary
House Bill 2707, known as Erik's Law, focuses on the regulation of alcoholic beverage licenses and permits in Texas. The bill introduces significant amendments to the Alcoholic Beverage Code, specifically targeting individuals and businesses that have previously been involved in violent incidents, such as shootings or stabbings, in relation to their alcoholic beverage licenses. According to the bill, if an applicant or individuals linked to a business have had their licenses revoked due to violent acts within the last three years, their new applications for permits authorizing on-premises consumption can be refused without a hearing. This provision aims to enhance public safety by preventing potentially dangerous individuals or establishments from serving alcoholic beverages to patrons.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HB2707 may revolve around concerns regarding the fairness of disqualifying applicants based on past incidents. Critics might argue that the bill could unfairly penalize individuals or businesses that have taken steps to address their past issues or those who were not directly responsible for violent acts associated with their license. Additionally, the bill's language allows for refusal of applications without a hearing, raising questions about due process and the potential for arbitrary enforcement of the law. These discussions could lead to debates about balancing public safety with individual rights and opportunities for businesses.
Relating to required notice prohibiting firearms at certain businesses selling or serving alcoholic beverages and the prohibition on carrying certain weapons on those premises.