Texas House Bill HJR113

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Refer: 3/10/11

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas to conduct gaming by executing a gaming agreement with this state.

Impact

Upon passage, the proposed amendment would significantly affect state laws regarding gaming by directly modifying regulatory framework to accommodate the specific terms of the gaming agreement with the Kickapoo tribe. It recognizes the Tribe's rights to Class III gaming activities, aligned with the standards set forth under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). The agreement would also necessitate oversight measures and responsibilities shared between state and tribal authorities, ensuring compliance with state laws while honoring tribal sovereignty.

Summary

HJR113 proposes a constitutional amendment to allow the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas to conduct gaming under a gaming agreement with the State of Texas. This amendment entails modifications to Section 47 of Article III of the Texas Constitution, providing legal ground for establishing a gaming compact between the Tribe and the State, thereby recognizing the Tribe's rights under federal law. The bill aims to improve the economic prospects of the Tribe by facilitating gaming operations and revenue generation, which are crucial for their self-sufficiency and the funding of local services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HJR113 appears to be cautiously supportive among those who recognize the potential economic benefits it could bring to the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe. Advocates emphasize the importance of allowing the Tribe to manage their gaming operations, arguing that this autonomy is essential for their economic empowerment. However, there are concerns from some quarters about the implications for gaming regulation in Texas, with critics suggesting it could pave the way for more expansive gaming in the state and challenge local governance standards.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions around HJR113 involves the balance between state control and tribal sovereignty. Stakeholders express concerns about the state's ability to regulate gaming activities without infringing on the Tribe's rights. Additionally, the potential social impacts of expanded gaming activities, such as issues related to problem gambling, have sparked debate. Ensuring proper regulatory frameworks that protect both community interests and the Tribe's autonomy will be critical as the amendment moves forward.