Texas House Bill HB2296

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/4/11
• Voted on by House: 4/15/11
• Refer: 3/10/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 3/24/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 4/15/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/19/11
• Enrolled: 5/27/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of Jefferson County Management District No. 1; providing authority to impose an assessment, impose a tax, and issue bonds.

Impact

The district is designed to supplement existing city and county services rather than replace them, providing a structured approach to improving public welfare and economic vitality in the area. It has the authority to finance various public works, including water and sewer systems, roads, park facilities, and economic development programs that incentivize local business growth. The financial mechanisms outlined in the bill allow the district to operate efficiently, utilizing mechanisms like ad valorem taxes and other revenue streams to fund its operations and initiatives, contributing positively to the community's infrastructure and economic conditions.

Summary

House Bill 2296 established the Jefferson County Management District No. 1, a special district aimed at fostering economic growth and development within Jefferson County, specifically the City of Port Arthur. The bill lays out provisions for the district to impose assessments, levy taxes, and issue bonds to fund various public improvement projects and services. The creation of this district aims to enhance local employment, commerce, transportation, housing, and recreational opportunities, thereby elevating the overall quality of life for residents in the district while also appealing to businesses and tourists.

Contention

Concerns may arise regarding the implications of the district's taxing authority and its capacity to impose assessments on property owners within its boundaries. By having the power to issue bonds and levy taxes, the district could create financial burdens for local residents if assessments are not managed prudently. Additionally, as it supplements rather than replaces city and county services, there may be debates on the adequacy of support for public infrastructure and whether the initiation of such districts leads to inequitable distribution of resources within Jefferson County.