Texas Senate Bill SCR39

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Caption

Granting the legislature permission to adjourn for more than three days during the period beginning on Thursday, April 6, 2023, and ending on Tuesday, April 11, 2023.

Impact

The implications of SCR39 are primarily procedural rather than substantive, impacting legislative procedural norms rather than direct changes to state law. The successful passage of this measure allows the legislature to manage its time effectively, ensuring that lawmakers can convene as needed without strictly adhering to the more rigid adjournment rules. This flexibility is particularly crucial during busy sessions when extensive deliberation on multiple bills or pressing issues requires more time than normal sessions would allow.

Summary

SCR39 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that seeks legislative permission for both the Texas Senate and House of Representatives to adjourn for more than three days. Specifically, it grants permission to adjourn from April 6, 2023, to April 11, 2023. This type of resolution is common in legislative bodies to formalize adjournment procedures that exceed the default three-day rule without mutual consent, as stipulated in the Texas Constitution. By adopting SCR39, the legislature aims to provide flexibility in its schedule, which can be essential for accommodating various legislative needs and responsibilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR39 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as evidenced by the unanimous votes both in the Senate (31-0) and the House (147-0, with one present but not voting). This strong support indicates that legislators recognize the importance of having the ability to extend session durations to better serve their legislative duties. Given the nature of the resolution, it did not generate significant opposition or public contention, positioning it as a practical necessity in legislative operations.

Contention

Due to the consensus on SCR39, there are no notable points of contention associated with its passage. The unanimous votes suggest that there were no significant disagreements or concerns from any political factions. The resolution is a procedural measure and not a policy measure that typically leads to debates or conflicts among lawmakers. Consequently, it serves as an example of bipartisan agreement on operational issues within the legislature.