Texas House Bill HB2918

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

• Filed: 2/27/23

Caption

Relating to the imposition of a supplemental court security fee on conviction of certain criminal offenses.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2918 will broaden the scope of financial obligations placed on individuals convicted of crimes, potentially leading to increased overall court costs. Local governments will receive additional funding for security measures, which could help improve public safety in court environments. However, there may be concerns about the additional financial burden placed on defendants, particularly those who may already be facing significant fines and penalties from their convictions. The bill could also set a precedent for the imposition of various new fees, potentially impacting how court costs are structured in the future.

Summary

House Bill 2918 seeks to impose a supplemental court security fee on individuals convicted of certain criminal offenses. This bill modifies existing statutes related to court costs by introducing a $1 fee that will be collected at the time of conviction for misdemeanors and felonies that include a fine. The fees collected are designated for security purposes within courthouses and municipal court buildings, providing funds that can be used for security personnel, services, and equipment. This change aims to enhance the safety and security of court facilities as a response to growing concerns over courthouse security.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2918 appears to be generally supportive among those prioritizing courthouse security. Advocates for the bill argue that enhancing courthouse safety is a critical necessity, particularly in light of recent incidents of violence in public places, including courthouses. Conversely, critics point to the financial implications this fee could have on low-income defendants, expressing concern that any added costs may further exacerbate existing inequities within the criminal justice system. Thus, the sentiment surrounding the bill remains mixed, reflecting the balance between security needs and financial fairness.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential financial implications for those convicted of offenses, raising questions about fairness in assessing fees on individuals who may already be economically disadvantaged. Additionally, there may be debates regarding how effectively these funds will be managed and utilized for the intended purpose of improving courthouse security. The imposition of such fees may also ignite discussions on broader reforms needed in the criminal justice system to address underlying issues, such as the financial burden on defendants.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Code Of Criminal Procedure

• Chapter 1. General Provisions
  • Section: New Section

Local Government Code

• Chapter 134. Criminal Fees Payable To Local Government
  • Section: New Section