Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2325

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/13/11  
Introduced
3/4/11  
Voted on by House
4/25/11  
Refer
3/10/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/17/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/24/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/17/11  
Enrolled
5/25/11  
Enrolled
5/25/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the competitive bidding and notice requirements for contracts of certain mass transportation authorities.

Impact

The passage of HB2325 is expected to have significant implications for the way transportation authorities manage their contracts. By raising the competitive bidding threshold, the bill could make it easier and quicker for these authorities to enter into certain contracts without undergoing the lengthy bidding process, thereby facilitating more efficient operations. However, this also poses the risk of reducing transparency and accountability in contract awarding practices, as fewer contracts will be subjected to competitive bidding, potentially increasing the likelihood of favoritism or collusion.

Summary

House Bill 2325 addresses the competitive bidding and notice requirements for contracts awarded by certain mass transportation authorities in Texas. The bill proposes to amend the existing Transportation Code to increase the threshold for contracts that require formal competitive bidding from $25,000 to $50,000. This change is aimed at streamlining the procurement process for regional transportation authorities and metropolitan rapid transit authorities in the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB2325 revolve around the balance between efficiency and competitive practices. Supporters of the increase argue that it will allow transportation authorities greater flexibility in procuring goods and services quickly, especially for smaller projects. Conversely, critics raise concerns that this change could lead to less competitive pricing and diminish the quality of services acquired, as contracts that exceed the new threshold would not undergo rigorous bidding processes. Additionally, the change may limit opportunities for smaller, local firms to compete for contracts previously requiring formal bids.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

TX SB1680

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by state agencies.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

TX SB68

Relating to contracting issues of state agencies, including ethics issues related to state contracting.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA SB770

Common interest developments: EV charging stations.

NJ A2517

Prohibits employment of illegal aliens and requires use of E-Verify program in public contracts.