Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB199

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the system by which an application for a low income housing tax credit is scored.

Impact

The proposed amendments would influence the existing laws regulating low income housing tax credits, particularly focusing on how applications are evaluated and scored. Changes would apply only to applications submitted after the law's effective date, meaning existing applications would not be impacted retroactively. The intention is to enhance the fairness and transparency of the process while ensuring that community-driven factors significantly contribute to the overall scoring of applications.

Summary

House Bill 199 aims to amend the scoring system for applications submitted for low income housing tax credits in Texas. The bill introduces a point-based scoring mechanism that prioritizes multiple factors to evaluate the financial viability of housing projects. Key components include the financial feasibility based on supporting data, quantifiable community involvement, tenant income levels, unit size and quality, and commitment of funding from local entities. The bill seeks to ensure that applications are thoroughly assessed based on these criteria to promote development that meets the community's needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 199 appears largely positive, with supporters advocating for a clearer and more structured evaluation process that recognizes community involvement and fiscal responsibility in housing development. The bill draws attention to the need for sustainable housing solutions while encouraging local participation in the development process. However, there may be some concerns among opponents who fear that alterations to the scoring might complicate or disadvantage certain types of applicants, particularly those who lack established community ties.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise from the criteria set forth in the scoring system. While the focus on financial feasibility and community participation is generally welcomed, stakeholders might debate the proper weight assigned to each criterion. Additionally, there could be discussions about how these changes might affect smaller developers or non-profits who may not have the extensive community backing compared to larger developers. Engaging diverse community voices in the housing development process will be crucial as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.